Hi Stephen,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 3:21 PM
> To: Doherty, Declan
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/8] bond: handle slaves with fewer que
2016-02-03 15:17, Declan Doherty:
> On 03/02/16 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > Hi Eric, Stephen, Declan,
> >
> > all patches of the set apart from this one and the next (nos 6 & 7) have no
> > comments and have been acked. Is there a resolution on these two patches,
> > so they
> > can be acke
On 03/02/16 11:28, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:18:34PM -0500, Eric Kinzie wrote:
>> On Fri Dec 04 19:36:09 +0100 2015, Andriy Berestovskyy wrote:
>>> Hi guys,
>>> I'm not quite sure if we can support less TX queues on a slave that easy:
>>>
queue_id = bond_slave_txqid(
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 02:18:34PM -0500, Eric Kinzie wrote:
> On Fri Dec 04 19:36:09 +0100 2015, Andriy Berestovskyy wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I'm not quite sure if we can support less TX queues on a slave that easy:
> >
> > > queue_id = bond_slave_txqid(internals, i, bd_tx_q->queue_id);
> > > num_
On 04/12/15 19:18, Eric Kinzie wrote:
> On Fri Dec 04 19:36:09 +0100 2015, Andriy Berestovskyy wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>> I'm not quite sure if we can support less TX queues on a slave that easy:
>>
>>> queue_id = bond_slave_txqid(internals, i, bd_tx_q->queue_id);
>>> num_tx_slave = rte_eth_tx_burst(sla
A common usage scenario is to bond a vnic like virtio which typically has
only a single rx queue with a VF device that has multiple receive queues.
This is done to do live migration
On Jan 5, 2016 05:47, "Declan Doherty" wrote:
> On 04/12/15 19:18, Eric Kinzie wrote:
>
>> On Fri Dec 04 19:36:09 +
Hi guys,
I'm not quite sure if we can support less TX queues on a slave that easy:
> queue_id = bond_slave_txqid(internals, i, bd_tx_q->queue_id);
> num_tx_slave = rte_eth_tx_burst(slaves[i], queue_id,
> slave_bufs[i], slave_nb_pkts[i]);
It seems that two different lcores might end up writin
On Fri Dec 04 19:36:09 +0100 2015, Andriy Berestovskyy wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I'm not quite sure if we can support less TX queues on a slave that easy:
>
> > queue_id = bond_slave_txqid(internals, i, bd_tx_q->queue_id);
> > num_tx_slave = rte_eth_tx_burst(slaves[i], queue_id,
> > slave_bufs[i],
From: Eric Kinzie
In the event that the bonding device has a greater number of tx and/or rx
queues than the slave being added, track the queue limits of the slave.
On receive, ignore queue identifiers beyond what the slave interface
can support. During transmit, pick a different queue id to use
9 matches
Mail list logo
