> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2017 12:44 PM
>
> On 6/1/2017 7:59 PM, Patil, Harish wrote:
> >>
> >
> >> On 5/28/2017 9:37 AM, Rasesh Mody wrote:
> >>> From: Harish Patil
> >>>
> >>> Some PMDs need to know the tunnel type in order to handle advance
On 6/1/2017 7:59 PM, Patil, Harish wrote:
>>
>
>> On 5/28/2017 9:37 AM, Rasesh Mody wrote:
>>> From: Harish Patil
>>>
>>> Some PMDs need to know the tunnel type in order to handle advance TX
>>> features. This patch adds a new TX offload flag for MPLS-in-UDP packets.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Harish
>
>On 5/28/2017 9:37 AM, Rasesh Mody wrote:
>> From: Harish Patil
>>
>> Some PMDs need to know the tunnel type in order to handle advance TX
>> features. This patch adds a new TX offload flag for MPLS-in-UDP packets.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Harish Patil
>> ---
>> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c |
On 5/28/2017 9:37 AM, Rasesh Mody wrote:
> From: Harish Patil
>
> Some PMDs need to know the tunnel type in order to handle advance TX
> features. This patch adds a new TX offload flag for MPLS-in-UDP packets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harish Patil
> ---
> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c |2 ++
> lib/
From: Harish Patil
Some PMDs need to know the tunnel type in order to handle advance TX
features. This patch adds a new TX offload flag for MPLS-in-UDP packets.
Signed-off-by: Harish Patil
---
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c |2 ++
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 17 ++---
2 files ch
5 matches
Mail list logo