[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/8] bond: active slaves with no primary

2016-01-05 Thread Declan Doherty
On 04/12/15 17:14, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > From: Eric Kinzie > > If the link state of a slave is "up" when added, it is added to the list > of active slaves but, even if it is the only slave, is not selected as > the primary interface. Generally, handling of link state interrupts > selects an

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/8] bond: active slaves with no primary

2015-12-04 Thread Stephen Hemminger
From: Eric Kinzie If the link state of a slave is "up" when added, it is added to the list of active slaves but, even if it is the only slave, is not selected as the primary interface. Generally, handling of link state interrupts selects an interface to be primary, but only if the active count i