> On Feb 15, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>
>> I guess I see this differently, meaning we modified the system to put vdev
>> devices last only because we do not have clean way to startup the system for
>> pdev/vdev devices. The
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
> I guess I see this differently, meaning we modified the system to put vdev
> devices last only because we do not have clean way to startup the system for
> pdev/vdev devices. The application should be agnostic to the devices being
> start
PM
>>> To: Shreyansh Jain
>>> Cc: Jan Blunck ; dev@dpdk.org
>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] eal: move virtual device probing into a
>>> bus
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:15 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>>>>
ject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] eal: move virtual device probing into a
> > bus
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:15 AM, Shreyansh Jain
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 15 February 2017 07:41 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> > &
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 11:10 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 11:06 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>>
On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:15 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
Just ignore this comment - I am misunderstood s
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 11:06 AM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:15 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Just ignore this comment - I am misunderstood something.
>>>
>>> But another question: Is there specific reason V
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>
>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:15 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>> Just ignore this comment - I am misunderstood something.
>>
>> But another question: Is there specific reason VDEV should be
>> registered/scanned *after* other devices? Is there
> -Original Message-
> From: Wiles, Keith [mailto:keith.wi...@intel.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 7:53 PM
> To: Shreyansh Jain
> Cc: Jan Blunck ; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] eal: move virtual device probing into a
> bus
>
>
&
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 8:15 AM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 15 February 2017 07:41 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
>> On Wednesday 15 February 2017 03:32 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>>> This is a refactoring of the virtual device probing which moves into into
>>> a proper bus structure.
>>>
>>> S
On Wednesday 15 February 2017 07:43 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
On Wednesday 15 February 2017 03:32 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
+
+static struct rte_bus rte_vdev_bus = {
+ .scan = vdev_scan,
+ .probe = vdev_probe,
+};
+
+RTE_REGISTER_B
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:11 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 February 2017 03:32 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
>>
>
>> +
>> +static struct rte_bus rte_vdev_bus = {
>> + .scan = vdev_scan,
>> + .probe = vdev_probe,
>> +};
>> +
>> +RTE_REGISTER_BUS_LATE(virtual, rte_vdev_bus);
>>
>
>
On Wednesday 15 February 2017 07:41 PM, Shreyansh Jain wrote:
On Wednesday 15 February 2017 03:32 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
This is a refactoring of the virtual device probing which moves into into
a proper bus structure.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 22
On Wednesday 15 February 2017 03:32 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
This is a refactoring of the virtual device probing which moves into into
a proper bus structure.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 22 -
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_vdev.c | 44
This is a refactoring of the virtual device probing which moves into into
a proper bus structure.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck
---
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_dev.c | 22 -
lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_vdev.c | 44 +
2 files changed, 44 inse
14 matches
Mail list logo
