Sorry there is a gcc error.
2015-10-18 22:16, Stephen Hemminger:
> + for (i = 0; i < vq_size; i++) {
virtio_ethdev.c:386:17: error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer
expressions
On 10/19/2015 11:47 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:19:50 +
> "Xie, Huawei" wrote:
>
>>> static int
>>> -virtqueue_enqueue_xmit(struct virtqueue *txvq, struct rte_mbuf *cookie)
>>> +virtqueue_enqueue_xmit(struct virtqueue *txvq, struct rte_mbuf *cookie,
>>> +
On 10/19/2015 1:16 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> The virtio ring in QEMU/KVM is usually limited to 256 entries
> and the normal way that virtio driver was queuing mbufs required
> nsegs + 1 ring elements. By using the indirect ring element feature
> if available, each packet will take only one rin
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 13:19:50 +
"Xie, Huawei" wrote:
> > static int
> > -virtqueue_enqueue_xmit(struct virtqueue *txvq, struct rte_mbuf *cookie)
> > +virtqueue_enqueue_xmit(struct virtqueue *txvq, struct rte_mbuf *cookie,
> > + int use_indirect)
> > {
> > struct vq_desc_
The virtio ring in QEMU/KVM is usually limited to 256 entries
and the normal way that virtio driver was queuing mbufs required
nsegs + 1 ring elements. By using the indirect ring element feature
if available, each packet will take only one ring slot even for
multi-segment packets.
Signed-off-by: S
5 matches
Mail list logo
