On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 02:24:56PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:10:25AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> >
> > Okay - I'll look at this part more. I think I went down the path of
> > explicitly setting these because the comments didn't match with what was
> > occuring (
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 09:10:25AM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote:
> "Ananyev, Konstantin" writes:
>
> >>
> >> > > Hi Aaron,
> >> > >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where
> >> > >> the
> >> > >> testing is supported, we can properly test the impleme
"Ananyev, Konstantin" writes:
>>
>> > > Hi Aaron,
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where the
>> > >> testing is supported, we can properly test the implementation specific
>> > >> code. One edge case is when we run on x86_64 systems that don't
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 07:29:09PM +0100, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
> > >
> > > > > Hi Aaron,
> > > > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where
> > > > >> the testing is supported, we can properly test the implementation
> > > > >> specific code
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 6:05 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin ; Aaron Conole
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob ; Gavin Hu
> ; Richardson, Bruce ;
> Michael Santana
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] acl: adjust the tests
>
>
>
> >
> > > >
> >
> > > > Hi Aaron,
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where
> > > >> the testing is supported, we can properly test the implementation
> > > >> specific code. One edge case is when we run on x86_64 systems that
> > > >> don't support AVX2,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2019 5:03 PM
> To: Aaron Conole
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Jerin Jacob ; Gavin Hu
> ; Richardson, Bruce ;
> Michael Santana
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] acl: adjust the tests
>
>
> > > Hi Aaron,
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Thi
>
> > > Hi Aaron,
> > >
> > >>
> > >> This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where the
> > >> testing is supported, we can properly test the implementation specific
> > >> code. One edge case is when we run on x86_64 systems that don't support
> > >> AVX2, but where the
> > Hi Aaron,
> >
> >>
> >> This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where the
> >> testing is supported, we can properly test the implementation specific
> >> code. One edge case is when we run on x86_64 systems that don't support
> >> AVX2, but where the compiler can gener
"Ananyev, Konstantin" writes:
> Hi Aaron,
>
>>
>> This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where the
>> testing is supported, we can properly test the implementation specific
>> code. One edge case is when we run on x86_64 systems that don't support
>> AVX2, but where the c
Hi Aaron,
>
> This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where the
> testing is supported, we can properly test the implementation specific
> code. One edge case is when we run on x86_64 systems that don't support
> AVX2, but where the compiler can generate such instructions.
This makes the tests pass, and also ensures that on platforms where the
testing is supported, we can properly test the implementation specific
code. One edge case is when we run on x86_64 systems that don't support
AVX2, but where the compiler can generate such instructions. That could
be an enha
12 matches
Mail list logo
