RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable

2023-02-14 Thread Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
ch, Pablo ; Trahe, Fiona > ; Doherty, Declan ; > ma...@nvidia.com; g.si...@nxp.com; Zhang, Roy Fan > ; jianjay.z...@huawei.com; asoma...@amd.com; > ruifeng.w...@arm.com; David Marchand > Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to > stable > > Folks,

RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable

2023-02-02 Thread Hemant Agrawal
Hi Akhil > > Can we promote the Asym APIs to stable now? +1 for it > > Regards, > Akhil > > > > > On 07/09/2021 12:45, Akhil Goyal wrote: > > >>> Do you think all the asym APIs are not eligible for promoting it > > >>> to stable > > >> APIs? > > >>> I haven't seen any changes for quite some

RE: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable

2023-02-02 Thread Akhil Goyal
Folks, Can we promote the Asym APIs to stable now? Regards, Akhil > > On 07/09/2021 12:45, Akhil Goyal wrote: > >>> Do you think all the asym APIs are not eligible for promoting it to stable > >> APIs? > >>> I haven't seen any changes for quite some time and we cannot have it > >>> experimenta

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable

2021-09-08 Thread Kinsella, Ray
Folks, On 07/09/2021 12:45, Akhil Goyal wrote: >>> Do you think all the asym APIs are not eligible for promoting it to stable >> APIs? >>> I haven't seen any changes for quite some time and we cannot have it >>> experimental Forever. >>> The APIs which you think are expected to change, we can leav

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable

2021-09-07 Thread Akhil Goyal
> > Do you think all the asym APIs are not eligible for promoting it to stable > APIs? > > I haven't seen any changes for quite some time and we cannot have it > > experimental Forever. > > The APIs which you think are expected to change, we can leave them as > > experimental And mark the others as

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable

2021-09-07 Thread Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
> Do you think all the asym APIs are not eligible for promoting it to stable > APIs? > I haven't seen any changes for quite some time and we cannot have it > experimental Forever. > The APIs which you think are expected to change, we can leave them as > experimental And mark the others as stable.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable

2021-09-03 Thread Akhil Goyal
Hi Arek, Do you think all the asym APIs are not eligible for promoting it to stable APIs? I haven't seen any changes for quite some time and we cannot have it experimental Forever. The APIs which you think are expected to change, we can leave them as experimental And mark the others as stable.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable

2021-08-30 Thread Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
gt; Doherty, Declan ; ma...@nvidia.com; > g.si...@nxp.com; Zhang, Roy Fan ; > jianjay.z...@huawei.com; asoma...@amd.com; ruifeng.w...@arm.com; > Akhil Goyal > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable > Hi Akhil, I am not sure if this API is ready to be

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] cryptodev: promote asym APIs to stable

2021-07-31 Thread Akhil Goyal
Asymmetric crypto APIs have been stable from quite some time, hence moving them from experimental to stable in DPDK 21.11 Signed-off-by: Akhil Goyal --- lib/cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.h | 10 -- lib/cryptodev/version.map | 24 +--- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+),