Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] mk: clean up static link with DPAA libraries

2018-02-23 Thread Hemant Agrawal
On 2/23/2018 2:55 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 23/02/2018 07:25, Hemant Agrawal: Hi Thomas, On 2/23/2018 4:23 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: The bus and mempool dependencies should be declared after the PMD libraries needing them. Moreover there is no need to disable the PMDs at the Makefile level,

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] mk: clean up static link with DPAA libraries

2018-02-23 Thread Thomas Monjalon
23/02/2018 07:25, Hemant Agrawal: > Hi Thomas, > On 2/23/2018 4:23 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The bus and mempool dependencies should be declared after the PMD > > libraries needing them. > > > > Moreover there is no need to disable the PMDs at the Makefile level, > > in case the dependencies

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] mk: clean up static link with DPAA libraries

2018-02-22 Thread Hemant Agrawal
Hi Thomas, On 2/23/2018 4:23 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: The bus and mempool dependencies should be declared after the PMD libraries needing them. Moreover there is no need to disable the PMDs at the Makefile level, in case the dependencies are not met. Such dependencies should be handled at conf

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] mk: clean up static link with DPAA libraries

2018-02-22 Thread Thomas Monjalon
The bus and mempool dependencies should be declared after the PMD libraries needing them. Moreover there is no need to disable the PMDs at the Makefile level, in case the dependencies are not met. Such dependencies should be handled at configuration time. The other side effect of this clean-up is