On 9/30/2017 4:18 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:09:38AM +, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
Actually, the key (and typical) issue of multi-process here is the fds are
process specific, while they are stored in the shared memory. That means
only one will take effect eventually. Wors
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:09:38AM +, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> > Actually, the key (and typical) issue of multi-process here is the fds are
> > process specific, while they are stored in the shared memory. That means
> > only one will take effect eventually. Worse, the old ones are lost.
> >
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:y...@fridaylinux.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 5:36 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maxime.coque...@redhat.com; mtetsu...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] vhost: support to kick in secondary process
>
> On Fri
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:y...@fridaylinux.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 5:36 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maxime.coque...@redhat.com; mtetsu...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] vhost: support to kick in secondary process
>
> On Fri
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 02:30:21AM +, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:y...@fridaylinux.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 5:18 PM
> > To: Tan, Jianfeng
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maxime.coque...@redhat.com; mtetsu...@gmail.com
> > Subj
> -Original Message-
> From: Yuanhan Liu [mailto:y...@fridaylinux.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 5:18 PM
> To: Tan, Jianfeng
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; maxime.coque...@redhat.com; mtetsu...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] vhost: support to kick in secondary process
>
> On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 03:04:39PM +0800, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> >On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 09:40:50AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> >>To support kick in secondary process, we propose callfd_pri and
> >>kickfd_pri to store the value in primary process; and by a new
> >>API, rte_vhost_set_vring_effecti
On 9/21/2017 11:33 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
Firstly, very sorry for so late review!
That is understood.
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 09:40:50AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
To support kick in secondary process, we propose callfd_pri and
kickfd_pri to store the value in primary process; and by a ne
Firstly, very sorry for so late review!
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 09:40:50AM +, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> To support kick in secondary process, we propose callfd_pri and
> kickfd_pri to store the value in primary process; and by a new
> API, rte_vhost_set_vring_effective_fd(), we can set effective
>
To support kick in secondary process, we propose callfd_pri and
kickfd_pri to store the value in primary process; and by a new
API, rte_vhost_set_vring_effective_fd(), we can set effective
callfd and kickfd which can be used by secondary process.
Note in this case, either primary process or the se
10 matches
Mail list logo
