[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] bond: use existing enslaved device queues

2015-04-14 Thread Wodkowski, PawelX
> > Pawel, > > I generally test things I've just built using virtio devices and calling > rte_eth_tx_queue_setup() more than once for a given queue id fails. > However, it seems that most PMDs allow re-allocating device queues while > virtio does not (xenvirt also seems to lack this functionality

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] bond: use existing enslaved device queues

2015-04-14 Thread Eric Kinzie
On Fri Apr 10 09:40:09 +0200 2015, Pawel Wodkowski wrote: > On 2015-04-06 19:01, Eric Kinzie wrote: > >If a device to be enslaved already has transmit and/or receive queues > >allocated, use those and then create any additional queues that are > >necessary. > > > >Signed-off-by: Eric Kinzie > >---

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] bond: use existing enslaved device queues

2015-04-10 Thread Pawel Wodkowski
On 2015-04-06 19:01, Eric Kinzie wrote: > If a device to be enslaved already has transmit and/or receive queues > allocated, use those and then create any additional queues that are > necessary. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Kinzie > --- > lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c |8 ++-- > 1 f

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] bond: use existing enslaved device queues

2015-04-06 Thread Eric Kinzie
If a device to be enslaved already has transmit and/or receive queues allocated, use those and then create any additional queues that are necessary. Signed-off-by: Eric Kinzie --- lib/librte_pmd_bond/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c |8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git