Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/sfc_efx: introduce 128-bit unsigned integer compat

2020-11-04 Thread Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > 22/10/2020 14:24, Andrew Rybchenko: > > Intel SSE has __m128i, but ARMv8 has __uint128_t. So, add compat > > efsys_uint128_t to be used in driver source and have either __u128i or > > __uint128_t behind. > > Could we do something in EAL for this common need? rte_int128_t is defined in EAL.

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/sfc_efx: introduce 128-bit unsigned integer compat

2020-11-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
22/10/2020 14:24, Andrew Rybchenko: > Intel SSE has __m128i, but ARMv8 has __uint128_t. So, add compat > efsys_uint128_t to be used in driver source and have either __u128i > or __uint128_t behind. Could we do something in EAL for this common need?

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/sfc_efx: introduce 128-bit unsigned integer compat

2020-10-30 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/22/2020 1:24 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: Intel SSE has __m128i, but ARMv8 has __uint128_t. So, add compat efsys_uint128_t to be used in driver source and have either __u128i or __uint128_t behind. Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton Series applied to dpdk-next-net

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] common/sfc_efx: introduce 128-bit unsigned integer compat

2020-10-22 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
Intel SSE has __m128i, but ARMv8 has __uint128_t. So, add compat efsys_uint128_t to be used in driver source and have either __u128i or __uint128_t behind. Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton --- drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_types.h | 8 drivers/common/sfc_efx