On 8/2/21 6:49 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 8/1/21 12:22 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
By its very name, action PORT_ID means that packets hit an ethdev with the
given DPDK port ID. At least the current comments don't state the opposite.
That said, since port representors had been adopted, applicat
On 8/1/21 12:22 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
> By its very name, action PORT_ID means that packets hit an ethdev with the
> given DPDK port ID. At least the current comments don't state the opposite.
> That said, since port representors had been adopted, applications like OvS
> have been misusing th
Acked-by: Ori Kam
Thanks,
Ori
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Rybchenko
>
> On 8/1/21 7:13 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Andrew Rybchenko
> >> Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 4:24 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: announce flow API action PORT_ID
> >> chan
Hi Ori,
On 8/2/21 10:28 AM, Ori Kam wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rybchenko
On 8/1/21 7:13 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
Hi Andrew,
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rybchenko
Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: announce flow API action PORT_I
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Rybchenko
> Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 4:24 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: announce flow API action PORT_ID changes
>
> On 8/1/21 3:56 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Andrew Rybchenk
On 8/1/21 7:13 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
Hi Andrew,
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rybchenko
Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: announce flow API action PORT_ID changes
On 8/1/21 3:56 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
Hi Andrew,
-Original Message-
From: Andre
Hi Andrew,
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Rybchenko
> Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 3:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: announce flow API action PORT_ID changes
>
> Hi Ori,
>
> On 8/1/21 3:23 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > I think before we can change the API we mu
Hi Andrew,
I think before we can change the API we must agree on the meaning of
representor.
PSB more comments
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Rybchenko
> Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 3:04 PM
> To: Eli Britstein ; NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon
> ; Ferruh Yigit ; Ori Kam
>
> Cc: dev@
On 8/1/2021 1:22 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
By its very name, action PORT_ID means that packets hit an ethdev with the
given DPDK port ID. At least the current comments don't state the opposite.
That said, since port representors had b
On 8/1/21 3:56 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
Hi Andrew,
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Rybchenko
Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ethdev: announce flow API action PORT_ID changes
Hi Ori,
On 8/1/21 3:23 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I think before we can change th
Hi Ori,
On 8/1/21 3:23 PM, Ori Kam wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I think before we can change the API we must agree on the meaning of
representor.
The question is not directly related to a representor definition.
Just indirectly. PORT_ID action makes sense for non-representor
ports as well.
PSB more c
On 8/1/21 1:57 PM, Eli Britstein wrote:
On 8/1/2021 1:22 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
By its very name, action PORT_ID means that packets hit an ethdev with
the
given DPDK port ID. At least the current comments don't state the
opposite
By its very name, action PORT_ID means that packets hit an ethdev with the
given DPDK port ID. At least the current comments don't state the opposite.
That said, since port representors had been adopted, applications like OvS
have been misusing the action. They misread its purpose as sending packet
14 matches
Mail list logo
