On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 8:12 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 09/11/2020 15:08, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 7:32 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 09/11/2020 14:35, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > Are you facing the issue with 32bit? Could you share the steps to
> > > > reproduce and gcc version?
> >
09/11/2020 15:08, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 7:32 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 09/11/2020 14:35, Jerin Jacob:
> > > Are you facing the issue with 32bit? Could you share the steps to
> > > reproduce and gcc version?
> >
> > Oh you're right, the issue was with 32-bit build,
>
> Thanks
>
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 7:32 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 09/11/2020 14:35, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 6:29 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > 09/11/2020 13:01, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > Hi @Thomas Monjalon
> > > >
> > > > Any specific reason why you removed the static assert from octe
09/11/2020 14:35, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 6:29 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > 09/11/2020 13:01, Jerin Jacob:
> > > Hi @Thomas Monjalon
> > >
> > > Any specific reason why you removed the static assert from octeontx2.
> >
> > I have a build failure when cross-compiling for octeontx
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 6:29 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 09/11/2020 13:01, Jerin Jacob:
> > Hi @Thomas Monjalon
> >
> > Any specific reason why you removed the static assert from octeontx2.
>
> I have a build failure when cross-compiling for octeontx2.
I am trying the below command, I am not abl
09/11/2020 13:01, Jerin Jacob:
> Hi @Thomas Monjalon
>
> Any specific reason why you removed the static assert from octeontx2.
I have a build failure when cross-compiling for octeontx2.
> I am not able to compilation issue with that static assert.
There is no issue when compiling for x86.
> Th
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:17 PM Bruce Richardson
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 01:57:26PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:34 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > 09/11/2020 06:18, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 2:03 AM Thomas Monjalon
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > > > Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:53 PM
> > > >
> > > > The mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
> > > > from the second to the first half.
> > > > It should increase performance on most systems having 64-byte cache
> > > >
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 10:33:41AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
> > On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > > > Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:53 PM
> > > >
> > > > The mempool pointer in the mbuf s
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > > Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:53 PM
> > >
> > > The mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
> > > from the second to the first half.
> > > It should increase p
> From: Bruce Richardson [mailto:bruce.richard...@intel.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 9, 2020 11:09 AM
>
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > > Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:53 PM
> > >
> > > The mempool
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:53 PM
> >
> > The mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
> > from the second to the first half.
> > It should increase performance on mo
On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 01:57:26PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:34 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > 09/11/2020 06:18, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 2:03 AM Thomas Monjalon
> > > wrote:
> > > > 07/11/2020 20:05, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:34 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 09/11/2020 06:18, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 2:03 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 07/11/2020 20:05, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:09 AM Thomas Monjalon
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > 07/11/2020 18:12, Jerin Jacob:
+CC techboard
> From: Jerin Jacob [mailto:jerinjac...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 9, 2020 6:18 AM
>
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 2:03 AM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> >
> > 07/11/2020 20:05, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:09 AM Thomas Monjalon
> wrote:
> > > > 07/11/2020 18:12, J
09/11/2020 06:18, Jerin Jacob:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 2:03 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 07/11/2020 20:05, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:09 AM Thomas Monjalon
> > > wrote:
> > > > 07/11/2020 18:12, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 10:04 PM Thomas Monjalon
> > > >
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 2:03 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 07/11/2020 20:05, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:09 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 07/11/2020 18:12, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 10:04 PM Thomas Monjalon
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The mempool pointer
07/11/2020 20:05, Jerin Jacob:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:09 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 07/11/2020 18:12, Jerin Jacob:
> > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 10:04 PM Thomas Monjalon
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
> > > > from the second to the first half.
On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 12:09 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> 07/11/2020 18:12, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 10:04 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >
> > > The mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
> > > from the second to the first half.
> > > It should increase performance on most sy
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:tho...@monjalon.net]
> Sent: Saturday, November 7, 2020 4:53 PM
>
> The mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
> from the second to the first half.
> It should increase performance on most systems having 64-byte cache line,
> i.e. mbuf is split in two cache lin
07/11/2020 18:12, Jerin Jacob:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 10:04 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >
> > The mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
> > from the second to the first half.
> > It should increase performance on most systems having 64-byte cache line,
>
> > i.e. mbuf is split in two cach
On Sat, Nov 7, 2020 at 10:04 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
> The mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
> from the second to the first half.
> It should increase performance on most systems having 64-byte cache line,
> i.e. mbuf is split in two cache lines.
But In any event, Tx needs to touch
The mempool pointer in the mbuf struct is moved
from the second to the first half.
It should increase performance on most systems having 64-byte cache line,
i.e. mbuf is split in two cache lines.
Due to this change, tx_offload is moved, so some vector data paths
may need to be adjusted. Note: OCTE
23 matches
Mail list logo
