[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM

2014-04-02 Thread Thomas Graf
On 04/02/2014 11:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry for the long delay. > > 2014-02-24 08:52, Chris Wright: >>> pkg/rpm.spec | 143 >> >> This should be dpdk.spec > > Actually it should be dpdk-core.spec. > Since it is a file hosted in the project, is it mandatory to have such namin

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM

2014-04-02 Thread Thomas Graf
On 04/02/2014 11:53 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2014-02-26 14:07, Thomas Graf: >>> +BuildRequires: kernel-devel, kernel-headers, doxygen >> >> Is a python environment required as well? > > Python is only needed to run some tools on the target. But is is optional. > Do you think it should be writte

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM

2014-04-02 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hello, Sorry for the long delay. 2014-02-26 14:07, Thomas Graf: > On 02/04/2014 04:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > +Version: 1.5.2r1 > > +Release: 1 > > What kind of upgrade strategy do you have in mind? > > I'm raising this because Fedora and other distributions will require > a unique packa

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM

2014-04-02 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hello, Sorry for the long delay. 2014-02-24 08:52, Chris Wright: > > pkg/rpm.spec | 143 > > This should be dpdk.spec Actually it should be dpdk-core.spec. Since it is a file hosted in the project, is it mandatory to have such naming? Could you explain why? When building it with "rpmbuild -ta

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM

2014-04-02 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 11:53:51AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry for the long delay. > > 2014-02-26 14:07, Thomas Graf: > > On 02/04/2014 04:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > +Version: 1.5.2r1 > > > +Release: 1 > > > > What kind of upgrade strategy do you have in mind? > >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM

2014-02-26 Thread Thomas Graf
On 02/04/2014 04:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Packages can be built with: > RPM_BUILD_NCPUS=8 rpmbuild -ta dpdk-1.5.2r2.tar.gz > > There are packages for runtime, static libraries and development. > Once devel package installed, it can be used like this: > make -C /usr/share/dpdk/exa

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM

2014-02-26 Thread Chris Wright
* Thomas Graf (tgraf at redhat.com) wrote: > On 02/04/2014 04:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >Packages can be built with: > > RPM_BUILD_NCPUS=8 rpmbuild -ta dpdk-1.5.2r2.tar.gz > > > >There are packages for runtime, static libraries and development. > >Once devel package installed, it can be u

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM

2014-02-24 Thread Chris Wright
* Thomas Monjalon (thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com) wrote: > Packages can be built with: > RPM_BUILD_NCPUS=8 rpmbuild -ta dpdk-1.5.2r2.tar.gz > > There are packages for runtime, static libraries and development. > Once devel package installed, it can be used like this: > make -C /usr/shar

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM

2014-02-24 Thread Chris Wright
* Thomas Monjalon (thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com) wrote: > Packages can be built with: > RPM_BUILD_NCPUS=8 rpmbuild -ta dpdk-1.5.2r2.tar.gz > > There are packages for runtime, static libraries and development. > Once devel package installed, it can be used like this: > make -C /usr/shar

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/16] pkg: add recipe for RPM

2014-02-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Packages can be built with: RPM_BUILD_NCPUS=8 rpmbuild -ta dpdk-1.5.2r2.tar.gz There are packages for runtime, static libraries and development. Once devel package installed, it can be used like this: make -C /usr/share/dpdk/examples/helloworld RTE_SDK=/usr/share/dpdk Signed-off-b