On 2015/03/12 11:05, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2015/03/12 7:25, Mcnamara, John wrote:
>> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand at 6wind.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 9:30 PM
>> To: Mcnamara, John
>> Cc: Tetsuya Mukawa; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject:
On 2015/03/12 7:25, Mcnamara, John wrote:
>
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 9:30 PM
> To: Mcnamara, John
> Cc: Tetsuya Mukawa; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] eal: rte_tailq api cleanup
>
dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] eal: rte_tailq api cleanup
>
> Hello John, Tetsuya,
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>
> > On 2015/03/12 7:25, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > > Here we go, it is pretty vanilla but I su
Hello John, Tetsuya,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2015/03/12 7:25, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> > Here we go, it is pretty vanilla but I sure you will get other data
> points by morning:
> >
> > $ uname -a
> > Linux sie-lab-214-036.ir.intel.com 3.6.10-4.fc18.x86
Hello John,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Mcnamara, John
wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:47 AM, David Marchand <
> david.marchand at 6wind.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Just sent a fix : http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/3976/
> > Can you try it ?
>
> I just tested the patch with testpmd and
From: David Marchand [mailto:david.march...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 9:30 PM
To: Mcnamara, John
Cc: Tetsuya Mukawa; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] eal: rte_tailq api cleanup
>> I just tested the patch with testpmd and it fixes the previous issue.
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of David Marchand
> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:29 PM
> To: Tetsuya Mukawa
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] eal: rte_tailq api cleanup
>
> On Wed, Mar 11
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:47 AM, David Marchand
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>
>>
>> $ T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc make install
>> $ sudo ./tools/dpdk_nic_bind.py -b igb_uio
>> $ sudo ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/testpmd -c f -n 1 -- -i
>> EAL: Detected l
On 2015/03/10 20:20, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-03-05 19:26, Neil Horman:
>> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:50:00PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
>>> This is a first cleanup at trying to remove references to other dpdk
>>> libraries
>>> from eal.
>>>
>>> This cleanup is focused on rte_tailq api whic
Hello Tetsuya,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
>
> $ T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc make install
> $ sudo ./tools/dpdk_nic_bind.py -b igb_uio
> $ sudo ./x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/testpmd -c f -n 1 -- -i
> EAL: Detected lcore 0 as core 0 on socket 0
>
> (snip)
>
> EAL:
2015-03-05 19:26, Neil Horman:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:50:00PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> > This is a first cleanup at trying to remove references to other dpdk
> > libraries
> > from eal.
> >
> > This cleanup is focused on rte_tailq api which has been marked as "for
> > internal
> > us
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:50:00PM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> This is a first cleanup at trying to remove references to other dpdk libraries
> from eal.
>
> This cleanup is focused on rte_tailq api which has been marked as "for
> internal
> use" for quite some time now.
> Rather than have a s
2015-03-04 22:50, David Marchand:
> 143 files changed, 310 insertions(+), 685 deletions(-)
Great job.
As it removes more lines than it adds, it's probably a good cleanup patchset ;)
--
Thomas
When there is no more things to remove, it's becoming perfect.
This is a first cleanup at trying to remove references to other dpdk libraries
from eal.
This cleanup is focused on rte_tailq api which has been marked as "for internal
use" for quite some time now.
Rather than have a static list in eal for all users of rte_tailq, a new register
system is introduc
14 matches
Mail list logo
