On 23/02/2015 18:23, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 02:58:30PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
>> On 23/02/2015 13:52, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:25:01AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
On 22/02/2015 23:37, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 2
On 23/02/2015 13:52, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:25:01AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
>> On 22/02/2015 23:37, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:31:36PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
On 13/02/2015 12:51, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 02:58:30PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> On 23/02/2015 13:52, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:25:01AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> >>On 22/02/2015 23:37, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:31:36PM +, Gonzalez Monroy,
On 22/02/2015 23:37, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:31:36PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
>> On 13/02/2015 12:51, Neil Horman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:08:02AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
On 13/02/2015 10:14, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/12/
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:25:01AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> On 22/02/2015 23:37, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:31:36PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> >>On 13/02/2015 12:51, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:08:02AM +, Gonzalez Monroy,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:31:36PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> On 13/02/2015 12:51, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:08:02AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> >>On 13/02/2015 10:14, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >>>On 02/12/2015 05:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu
On 13/02/2015 12:51, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:08:02AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
>> On 13/02/2015 10:14, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>> On 02/12/2015 05:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:07:50PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/12/2015
On 02/12/2015 05:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:07:50PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> On 02/12/2015 02:23 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
[...snip...]
>>>
>> So I just realized that I was not having into account a possible
>> scenario, where
>> we have an app built
On 13/02/2015 10:14, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 02/12/2015 05:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:07:50PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>> On 02/12/2015 02:23 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> [...snip...]
>>> So I just realized that I was not having into account a possibl
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:08:02AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> On 13/02/2015 10:14, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >On 02/12/2015 05:52 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >>On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 04:07:50PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >>>On 02/12/2015 02:23 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >[...snip...]
>
rman at tuxdriver.com]
>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 6:13 PM
>>>>> To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
>>>>> Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Improve build process
>>>>>
>>>>
On 02/11/2015 01:11 PM, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
>> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 6:13 PM
>> To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
>> Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Impr
Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> >>>>>From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> >>>>>Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 6:13 PM
> >>>>>To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> >>>>>Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
> >>>&
dev at dpdk.org
>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Improve build process
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 05:38:49PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
>>> wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>>>
>>>> So would it be reasonable to add
s Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Improve build process
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 05:38:49PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>>>> So would it be reasonable to add DT_NEEDED entries to
0, 2015 6:13 PM
> >>>To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> >>>Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
> >>>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Improve build process
> >>>
> >>>On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 05:38:49PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> >&
Friday, January 30, 2015 6:13 PM
> >>>To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> >>>Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
> >>>Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Improve build process
> >>>
> >>>On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 05:38:49PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergi
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 11:11:13AM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 6:13 PM
> > To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> > Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 6:13 PM
> To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Improve build process
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 05:38:49PM +, Go
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 2:05 PM
> To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Improve build process
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 01:39:28PM +, Go
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 7:46 PM
> To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Improve build process
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 05:04:20PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Ser
man [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 4:39 PM
> > > > > > To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> > > > > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Improve build p
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 01:39:28PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 7:46 PM
> > To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PA
2015-01-29 11:38, Neil Horman:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:20:03PM +, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> > This patch series improves the DPDK build system mostly for shared
> > libraries (and a few nits for static libraries) with the following goals:
> > - Create a library containing core DPDK
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 4:39 PM
> To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/8] Improve build process
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:20:03PM +, Sergio Gonzalez M
This patch series improves the DPDK build system mostly for shared
libraries (and a few nits for static libraries) with the following goals:
- Create a library containing core DPDK libraries (librte_eal,
librte_malloc, librte_mempool, librte_mbuf and librte_ring).
The idea of core libraries
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 05:04:20PM +, Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio wrote:
> > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 4:39 PM
> > To: Gonzalez Monroy, Sergio
> > Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PA
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 03:20:03PM +, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> This patch series improves the DPDK build system mostly for shared
> libraries (and a few nits for static libraries) with the following goals:
> - Create a library containing core DPDK libraries (librte_eal,
>librte_mall
28 matches
Mail list logo