[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] libeventdev API and northbound implementation

2016-11-22 Thread Shreyansh Jain
On Tuesday 22 November 2016 07:30 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:57:15AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:04:29PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: >>> +Thomas >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:25:18PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: On Fri, Nov 18, 201

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] libeventdev API and northbound implementation

2016-11-22 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 12:57:15AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:04:29PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > +Thomas > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:25:18PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:14:58AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > > As previ

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] libeventdev API and northbound implementation

2016-11-22 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-21 09:57, Bruce Richardson: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:40:50AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Are you asking for a temporary tree? > > If yes, please tell its name and its committers, it will be done. > > Yes, we are asking for a new tree, but I would not assume it is > temporary - it

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] libeventdev API and northbound implementation

2016-11-21 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-19 00:57, Jerin Jacob: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:04:29PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:25:18PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:14:58AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > > Possible next steps: > > > > 1) Review this patch set >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] libeventdev API and northbound implementation

2016-11-21 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:40:50AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-11-19 00:57, Jerin Jacob: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:04:29PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:25:18PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:14:58AM +0530, Jerin Jac

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] libeventdev API and northbound implementation

2016-11-19 Thread Jerin Jacob
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:04:29PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > +Thomas > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:25:18PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:14:58AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > As previously discussed in RFC v1 [1], RFC v2 [2], with changes > > > described i

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] libeventdev API and northbound implementation

2016-11-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
+Thomas On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 03:25:18PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:14:58AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > > As previously discussed in RFC v1 [1], RFC v2 [2], with changes > > described in [3] (also pasted below), here is the first non-draft series > > for this new

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] libeventdev API and northbound implementation

2016-11-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:14:58AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote: > As previously discussed in RFC v1 [1], RFC v2 [2], with changes > described in [3] (also pasted below), here is the first non-draft series > for this new API. > > [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-August/045181.html > [2] http:/

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] libeventdev API and northbound implementation

2016-11-18 Thread Jerin Jacob
As previously discussed in RFC v1 [1], RFC v2 [2], with changes described in [3] (also pasted below), here is the first non-draft series for this new API. [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-August/045181.html [2] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-October/048592.html [3] http://dpdk.org/ml