[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] enhancement to i40e PF host driver

2017-01-03 Thread Chen Jing D(Mark)
Current PF host driver can serve DPDK VF well, but the implementation is not complete to support Linux VF, even both DPDK VF and Linux VF use same API set. This patch set made below changes: 1. Make an enhancement on interface to serve VF, so both Linux and DPDK VF can be well served. 2. Change

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] enhancement to i40e PF host driver

2016-12-26 Thread Chen, Jing D
Hi, Vincent, Since original patch set are split into 2 different patches, can we discuss in this thread? Attach original discussion below. Sorry for top-post. > > Le 22/12/2016 à 09:10, Chen, Jing D a écrit : > > In the meanwhile, we have some test models ongoing to validate > > combination of

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] enhancement to i40e PF host driver

2016-12-23 Thread Vincent JARDIN
Thanks for this update. Still, I would like to get good arguments why DPDK should be a PF because it creates fragmentations. Please, first, let's reply to: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-December/053107.html Having both Linux and DPDK being PF, it means that we double the combinations