From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 4:57 PM
To: Neil Horman
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Add DSO symbol versioning to support
backwards compatibility
Hi Neil,
2014-10-07 17:01, Neil Horman:
> On
Hi Neil,
2014-10-07 17:01, Neil Horman:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:59:40PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:45:49AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Hi Neil,
> > > >
> > > > 2014-09-24 14:19, Neil Ho
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:57:29PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> 2014-10-07 17:01, Neil Horman:
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:59:40PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:45:49AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Thoma
On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 02:59:40PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:45:49AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Hi Neil,
> > >
> > > 2014-09-24 14:19, Neil Horman:
> > > > Ping Thomas. I know you're busy, but I
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:45:49AM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > 2014-09-24 14:19, Neil Horman:
> > > Ping Thomas. I know you're busy, but I would like this to not fall off
> > > anyones
> > > radar. You alluded
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 03:02:55PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:45:49 -0400
> Neil Horman wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Hi Neil,
> > >
> > > 2014-09-24 14:19, Neil Horman:
> > > > Ping Thomas. I know you're busy, b
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:45:49 -0400
Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > 2014-09-24 14:19, Neil Horman:
> > > Ping Thomas. I know you're busy, but I would like this to not fall off
> > > anyones
> > > radar. You alluded to co
Hi Neil,
2014-09-24 14:19, Neil Horman:
> Ping Thomas. I know you're busy, but I would like this to not fall off anyones
> radar. You alluded to concerns regarding what, for lack of a better term,
> ABI/API lockin. I had asked you to enuumerate/elaborate on specifics, but
> never
> heard back.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 12:41:33PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> 2014-09-24 14:19, Neil Horman:
> > Ping Thomas. I know you're busy, but I would like this to not fall off
> > anyones
> > radar. You alluded to concerns regarding what, for lack of a better term,
> > ABI/API lockin.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 03:14:01PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 08:23:36PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > 2014-09-15 15:23, Neil Horman:
> > > The DPDK ABI develops and changes quickly, which makes it difficult for
> > > applications to keep up with the l
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 07:18:36AM -0700, Venkatesan, Venky wrote:
> On 9/18/2014 12:14 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 08:23:36PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>Hi Neil,
> >>
> >>2014-09-15 15:23, Neil Horman:
> >>>The DPDK ABI develops and changes quickly, which makes it diff
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 8:14 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Richardson, Bruce
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add DSO symbol versioning to support backwards
> compatibility
>
> On Thu, Sep 1
On 9/18/2014 12:14 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 08:23:36PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> Hi Neil,
>>
>> 2014-09-15 15:23, Neil Horman:
>>> The DPDK ABI develops and changes quickly, which makes it difficult for
>>> applications to keep up with the latest version of the librar
Hi Neil,
2014-09-15 15:23, Neil Horman:
> The DPDK ABI develops and changes quickly, which makes it difficult for
> applications to keep up with the latest version of the library, especially
> when
> it (the DPDK) is built as a set of shared objects, as applications may be
> built
> against an o
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 08:23:36PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> 2014-09-15 15:23, Neil Horman:
> > The DPDK ABI develops and changes quickly, which makes it difficult for
> > applications to keep up with the latest version of the library, especially
> > when
> > it (the DPDK) is b
The DPDK ABI develops and changes quickly, which makes it difficult for
applications to keep up with the latest version of the library, especially when
it (the DPDK) is built as a set of shared objects, as applications may be built
against an older version of the library.
To mitigate this, this pa
16 matches
Mail list logo
