[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-14 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 11:09 PM > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian ; Stephen > Hemminger > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-14 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-13 22:47, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > > 2016-03-08 07:49, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > > > Regarding Stephen's patches, I think there is a pending issue regarding > > > the > > legal side of the Copyright, which is attributed to Intel, a

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-13 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-08 07:49, Dumitrescu, Cristian: > We are working on implementing an alternative solution based on 2x 64-bit > multiplication, which is supported by CPUs and compilers for more than a > decade now. The 32-bit solution proposed by Stephen requires truncation with > some loss of precision,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-13 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 10:26 PM > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian ; Stephen > Hemminger > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-10 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 6:44 PM To: Dumitrescu, Cristian Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2 Why does this need to be reassigned to Intel. That is not how the DPDK

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-10 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 8:41 PM > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2 > > On

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-10 Thread Stephen Hemminger
From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 8:41 PM > > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian > > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2 > > > > On Tue,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-08 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen at networkplumber.org] > Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 4:33 PM > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian > Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2 > > On

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
mas Monjalon ; dev at dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2 > > > > On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:49:20 + > > "Dumitrescu, Cristian" wrote: > > > > > Regarding Stephen's patches, I think there is a pendin

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 07:49:20 + "Dumitrescu, Cristian" wrote: > Regarding Stephen's patches, I think there is a pending issue regarding the > legal side of the Copyright, which is attributed to Intel, although Stephen's > code is relicensed with BSD license by permission from the original cod

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-08 Thread Dumitrescu, Cristian
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com] > Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 3:01 PM > To: Dumitrescu, Cristian > Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Stephen Hemminger > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2 > > 2

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2016-03-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-29 10:46, Stephen Hemminger: > This is the last round of sched updates for 2.2. It is based > on code changes (extensively) tested by QA and used in the vRouter. > > Stephen Hemminger (3): > rte_sched: keep track of RED drops > rte_sched: introduce reciprocal divide > rte_sched: elim

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] sched: patches for 2.2

2015-11-29 Thread Stephen Hemminger
This is the last round of sched updates for 2.2. It is based on code changes (extensively) tested by QA and used in the vRouter. Stephen Hemminger (3): rte_sched: keep track of RED drops rte_sched: introduce reciprocal divide rte_sched: eliminate floating point in calculating byte clock li