[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n

2015-10-27 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/26/2015 06:56 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Panu, > Please use --subject-prefix 'PATCH v2' to ease patch management, > as explained here: > http://dpdk.org/dev#send > > git send-email --subject-prefix 'PATCH vX+1' --annotate --cover-letter > --in-reply-to > > It should appear on the co

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n

2015-10-26 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Panu, Please use --subject-prefix 'PATCH v2' to ease patch management, as explained here: http://dpdk.org/dev#send git send-email --subject-prefix 'PATCH vX+1' --annotate --cover-letter --in-reply-to It should appear on the cover letter and the patches. Thanks

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n

2015-10-26 Thread Thomas Monjalon
> > The number of memory channels is a truly obscure thing as a mandatory > > command line argument when its really just an optimization. > > Provide a reasonable default in mempool as suggested by Bruce Richardson > > and make the -n argument optional in EAL to make DPDK that little bit > > easier

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n

2015-10-26 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-15 13:12, Mcnamara, John: > From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmatilai at redhat.com] > > Sure. I was planning on going through the docs and updating them > > (separately) if the change is otherwise accepted, I suspect there are more > > than those two places needing changes. Actually the docs

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n

2015-10-15 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 10/15/2015 03:10 PM, Mcnamara, John wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Panu Matilainen >> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:49 PM >> To: dev at dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reas

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n

2015-10-15 Thread Panu Matilainen
The number of memory channels is a truly obscure thing as a mandatory command line argument when its really just an optimization. Provide a reasonable default in mempool as suggested by Bruce Richardson and make the -n argument optional in EAL to make DPDK that little bit easier to use for a first-

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n

2015-10-15 Thread David Marchand
Hello, On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > The number of memory channels is a truly obscure thing as a mandatory > command line argument when its really just an optimization. > Provide a reasonable default in mempool as suggested by Bruce Richardson > and make the -n argume

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n

2015-10-15 Thread Mcnamara, John
> -Original Message- > From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmatilai at redhat.com] > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 1:37 PM > To: Mcnamara, John; dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n > > Sure. I was planning on going

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n

2015-10-15 Thread Mcnamara, John
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Panu Matilainen > Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 12:49 PM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n > > The number of memory channels is a t