On 07/13/2016 07:42 PM, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:27:18 +0200
> Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>> Hi Jan,
>>
>> On 07/13/2016 11:24 AM, Jan Viktorin wrote:
>>> GCC 6 is complaining and seems to be correct here.
>>>
>>> virtio_user_ethdev.c:345:2: error:
>>> this ?if? clause does
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:27:18 +0200
Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 07/13/2016 11:24 AM, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> > GCC 6 is complaining and seems to be correct here.
> >
> > virtio_user_ethdev.c:345:2: error:
> > this ?if? clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
> >
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 11:27:18 +0200
Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 07/13/2016 11:24 AM, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> > GCC 6 is complaining and seems to be correct here.
> >
> > virtio_user_ethdev.c:345:2: error:
> > this ?if? clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
> >
Hi Jan,
On 07/13/2016 11:24 AM, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> GCC 6 is complaining and seems to be correct here.
>
> virtio_user_ethdev.c:345:2: error:
> this ?if? clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
>if (rte_kvargs_count(kvlist, VIRTIO_USER_ARG_PATH) == 1)
>^~
>
> virt
GCC 6 is complaining and seems to be correct here.
virtio_user_ethdev.c:345:2: error:
this ?if? clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
if (rte_kvargs_count(kvlist, VIRTIO_USER_ARG_PATH) == 1)
^~
virtio_user_ethdev.c:348:3: note:
...this statement, but the la
5 matches
Mail list logo