On 10/24/19 6:31 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:32:43 +0200
> Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>
>> Hi Flavio,
>>
>> On 10/24/19 4:28 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>>> Currently the IPv4 header checksum is calculated including its
>>> current value, which can be a valid checksum or just
On Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:32:43 +0200
Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Hi Flavio,
>
> On 10/24/19 4:28 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > Currently the IPv4 header checksum is calculated including its
> > current value, which can be a valid checksum or just garbage.
> > In any case, if the original value is not
Hi Flavio,
On 10/24/19 4:28 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> Currently the IPv4 header checksum is calculated including its
> current value, which can be a valid checksum or just garbage.
> In any case, if the original value is not zero, then the result
> is always wrong.
>
> The IPv4 checksum is defi
Currently the IPv4 header checksum is calculated including its
current value, which can be a valid checksum or just garbage.
In any case, if the original value is not zero, then the result
is always wrong.
The IPv4 checksum is defined in RFC791, page 14 says:
Header Checksum: 16 bits
The che
4 matches
Mail list logo