2016-09-27 11:01, Frederico Cadete:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Wu, Jingjing
> wrote:
> > From: Frederico.Cadete-
> >> The flow_director_filter commands has a pf|vf option for most modes
> >> except for MAC-VLAN and tunnel. On Intel NIC's these modes are not
> >> supported under virtualize
> Cc: frederico at cadete.eu; Frederico Cadete
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] testpmd: fix fdir command on MAC and tunnel
>> modes
>>
>> From: Frederico Cadete
>>
>> The flow_director_filter commands has a pf|vf option for most modes
>> except for MA
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Frederico.Cadete-
> ext at oneaccess-net.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2016 5:11 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: frederico at cadete.eu; Frederico Cadete
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PAT
Anyone to review please?
2016-08-23 11:10, Frederico.Cadete-ext at oneaccess-net.com:
> The flow_director_filter commands has a pf|vf option for most modes
> except for MAC-VLAN and tunnel. On Intel NIC's these modes are not
> supported under virtualized environments.
> But the application was che
From: Frederico Cadete
The flow_director_filter commands has a pf|vf option for most modes
except for MAC-VLAN and tunnel. On Intel NIC's these modes are not
supported under virtualized environments.
But the application was checking that this field was parsed for these cases,
even though this tok
5 matches
Mail list logo