Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/mbuf: skip field registration at busy offset

2020-10-31 Thread Thomas Monjalon
31/10/2020 15:57, David Marchand: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 3:37 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > There is a test for dynamic field registration at a specific offset. > > Depending on which driver is probed, some dynamic fields may be > > already registered at this offset. > > This failure is ski

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/mbuf: skip field registration at busy offset

2020-10-31 Thread David Marchand
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 3:37 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > There is a test for dynamic field registration at a specific offset. > Depending on which driver is probed, some dynamic fields may be > already registered at this offset. > This failure is skipped with a warning. > > Fixes: 4958ca3a443a (

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/mbuf: skip field registration at busy offset

2020-10-31 Thread Thomas Monjalon
There is a test for dynamic field registration at a specific offset. Depending on which driver is probed, some dynamic fields may be already registered at this offset. This failure is skipped with a warning. Fixes: 4958ca3a443a ("mbuf: support dynamic fields and flags") Cc: sta...@dpdk.org Report