06/02/2018 03:21, Phil Yang:
> Since RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES is configurable, the existing socket number
> could greater than RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES. Optimize test case to cover this
> situation.(i.e RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES=1)
>
> Fixes: 45f1b6e8680a ('app: add new tests on eal flags')
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> S
Guan
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test/eal_flags: Optimize memory flags test
>
> Hi,
>
> Your patch has been forgotten for months.
> Do not hesitate to ping if no reply.
>
> I have a question below.
>
> 06/02/2018 03:21, Phil Yang:
> > --- a/test/test/test
Hi,
Your patch has been forgotten for months.
Do not hesitate to ping if no reply.
I have a question below.
06/02/2018 03:21, Phil Yang:
> --- a/test/test/test_eal_flags.c
> +++ b/test/test/test_eal_flags.c
> -#define SOCKET_MEM_STRLEN (RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES * 10)
> +#define SOCKET_MEM_STRLEN (RTE_
Since RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES is configurable, the existing socket number
could greater than RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES. Optimize test case to cover this
situation.(i.e RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES=1)
Fixes: 45f1b6e8680a ('app: add new tests on eal flags')
Signed-off-by: Phil Yang
---
test/test/test_eal_flags.c | 7 +
4 matches
Mail list logo