ts are accepted.
>
> Best regards,
> Jozef
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 3:13 PM
> To: Jozef Martiniak -X (jozmarti - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) at cisco.com>
> Cc: dev at
[mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 3:13 PM
To: Jozef Martiniak -X (jozmarti - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rte_delay_us can be replaced with user function
Hi,
I think this feature should enter in the release 16.11.
Hi,
I think this feature should enter in the release 16.11.
We just need to make sure it is implemented with the right API.
Do you have any comment about managing several builtin handlers?
2016-09-13 22:04, Thomas Monjalon:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for late review.
> This patch was in a summer hole :/
>
Hi,
Sorry for late review.
This patch was in a summer hole :/
First a general comment: please check your patch with
scripts/checkpatches.sh.
In order to ease tracking of this patch, please increment the version
when sending a new one in the same thread:
git send-email -1 -v3 --annotate --
From: Jozef Martiniak
When running single-core, some drivers tend to call rte_delay_us for a
long time, and that is causing packet drops.
To avoid this, rte_delay_us can be replaced with user-defined delay
function with:
void rte_delay_us_callback_register(void(*userfunc)(unsigned));
When userf
Hi,
2016-07-19 14:42, jozmarti at cisco.com:
> when running single-core, some drivers tend to call rte_delay_us for a
> long time, and that is causing packet drops.
> Attached patch introduces 2 new functions:
>
> void rte_delay_us_callback_register(void(*userfunc)(unsigned));
> void rte_delay_us
From: Jozef Martiniak
when running single-core, some drivers tend to call rte_delay_us for a
long time, and that is causing packet drops.
Attached patch introduces 2 new functions:
void rte_delay_us_callback_register(void(*userfunc)(unsigned));
void rte_delay_us_callback_unregister(void);
First
Hi,
On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 15:21 +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
Hi,
>
> 2016-07-19 14:42, jozmarti at cisco.com:
> > when running single-core, some drivers tend to call rte_delay_us for a
> > long time, and that is causing packet drops.
> > Attached patch introduces 2 new functions:
> >
> > void r
Hi Jozef,
I have two quick comments inline.
> On Jul 19, 2016, at 7:42 AM, jozmarti at cisco.com wrote:
>
> From: Jozef Martiniak
>
> when running single-core, some drivers tend to call rte_delay_us for a
> long time, and that is causing packet drops.
> Attached patch introduces 2 new functions
9 matches
Mail list logo
