On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 10:51:17PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 03/11/2020 21:21, Thomas Monjalon:
> > 03/11/2020 15:48, Bruce Richardson:
> > > Coverity flags a possible problem where the 8-bit wq_idx value may have
> > > errors when shifted and sign-extended to 64-bits. Since this can only
>
03/11/2020 21:21, Thomas Monjalon:
> 03/11/2020 15:48, Bruce Richardson:
> > Coverity flags a possible problem where the 8-bit wq_idx value may have
> > errors when shifted and sign-extended to 64-bits. Since this can only occur
> > if the shift index is larger than any expected value from hardware
03/11/2020 15:48, Bruce Richardson:
> Coverity flags a possible problem where the 8-bit wq_idx value may have
> errors when shifted and sign-extended to 64-bits. Since this can only occur
> if the shift index is larger than any expected value from hardware, it's
> unlikely to cause any real problem
Coverity flags a possible problem where the 8-bit wq_idx value may have
errors when shifted and sign-extended to 64-bits. Since this can only occur
if the shift index is larger than any expected value from hardware, it's
unlikely to cause any real problems, but we can eliminate any
possible errors,
4 matches
Mail list logo
