Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe

2020-09-11 Thread Ferruh Yigit
in this case. > > -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit > Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 7:23 PM > To: jiawe...@trustnetic.com; dev@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe > > On 9/10/2020 8:16 AM,

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe

2020-09-10 Thread jiawenwu
...@trustnetic.com; dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe On 9/10/2020 8:16 AM, jiawe...@trustnetic.com wrote: > Hi Ferruh, > > I am sorry that the patch work plan was disrupted due to other work inserted. > But I have created another nearly 40 patches as

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe

2020-09-10 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 9/10/2020 8:16 AM, jiawe...@trustnetic.com wrote: > Hi Ferruh, > > I am sorry that the patch work plan was disrupted due to other work inserted. > But I have created another nearly 40 patches as the 2nd set. > Should I send this set as a supplement to the previous one(as version v1 or > v2?),

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe

2020-09-10 Thread jiawenwu
Hi Ferruh, I am sorry that the patch work plan was disrupted due to other work inserted. But I have created another nearly 40 patches as the 2nd set. Should I send this set as a supplement to the previous one(as version v1 or v2?), or fix and verify the previous one firstly? -Original Messag

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe

2020-09-09 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 11:02:31 +0800 Jiawen Wu wrote: > +# CFLAGS for gcc > +# > +ifeq ($(shell test $(GCC_VERSION) -ge 44 && echo 1), 1) > +CFLAGS += -Wno-deprecated > +endif Why is this flag on for the driver code?

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe

2020-09-09 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 9/1/2020 12:52 PM, jiawe...@trustnetic.com wrote: > Hi Ferruh, > > Since this patch is too large, it needs to be split into so many small > patches, which takes a lot of time. Thanks Jiawen for the work, I am aware it is not easy to arrange the patches and it takes time. Mostly looks good, I

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe

2020-09-01 Thread jiawenwu
Hi Ferruh, Since this patch is too large, it needs to be split into so many small patches, which takes a lot of time. Therefore, I first created a part of patches to contribute. And if there is a review problem with these patches, please let me know as soon. And I will complete the remaining pat

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe

2020-08-24 Thread jiawenwu
Hi Ferruh, Thanks for your suggestion. I'll split the patch into a patchset as soon as possible. -Original Message- From: Ferruh Yigit Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2020 7:49 PM To: Jiawen Wu ; dev@dpdk.org Cc: jianw...@trustnetic.com; yuhongzh...@trustnetic.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] net:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net: add a new network PMD named txgbe

2020-08-20 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 8/20/2020 4:02 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote: > This is a new network PMD named txgbe provides poll mode driver support for > Wangxun 10Gb Ethernet NICs. > > Beijing WangXun Technology Co., Ltd. is a high-tech company specializing in > the design of high-end integrated circuit chips and providing indep