Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: use PCI BDF as the port name

2018-03-01 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 1/22/2018 9:30 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition > in OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev > name. This breaks the typical OVS DPDK use case and brings more puzzle > to the end users. > > To fix it, this patc

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: use PCI BDF as the port name

2018-01-25 Thread Shahaf Shuler
Tuesday, January 23, 2018 10:24 AM, Nélio Laranjeiro: > Hi Yuanhan, > > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:30:06PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > > It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition in > > OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev name. > > This breaks

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: use PCI BDF as the port name

2018-01-23 Thread Nélio Laranjeiro
Hi Yuanhan, On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 05:30:06PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition > in OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev > name. This breaks the typical OVS DPDK use case and brings more puzzle > to the end

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: use PCI BDF as the port name

2018-01-22 Thread Yuanhan Liu
It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition in OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev name. This breaks the typical OVS DPDK use case and brings more puzzle to the end users. To fix it, this patch changes it to use PCI BDF as the name, too. Also, a