Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: make FDB default rule optional

2020-01-31 Thread Kevin Traynor
On 30/01/2020 13:06, Raslan Darawsheh wrote: > Hi, >> -Original Message- >> From: dev On Behalf Of Matan Azrad >> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 7:07 PM >> To: Slava Ovsiienko >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] n

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: make FDB default rule optional

2020-01-30 Thread Raslan Darawsheh
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: dev On Behalf Of Matan Azrad > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 7:07 PM > To: Slava Ovsiienko > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: make FDB default rule optional > > There are RDMA-COR

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: make FDB default rule optional

2020-01-28 Thread Slava Ovsiienko
> -Original Message- > From: Matan Azrad > Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2020 19:07 > To: Slava Ovsiienko > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org > Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: make FDB default rule optional > > There are RDMA-CORE versions which are not supported multi-table for some > Mellanox

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: make FDB default rule optional

2020-01-28 Thread Matan Azrad
There are RDMA-CORE versions which are not supported multi-table for some Mellanox mlx5 devices. Hence, the optimization added in commit [1] which forwards all the FDB traffic to table 1 cannot be configured. Make the above optimization optional: Do not fail when either table 1 cannot be created