Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: do not select legacy MPW implicitly

2020-06-15 Thread Raslan Darawsheh
Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Alexander Kozyrev > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:42 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh ; Slava > Ovsiienko > Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: do not select legacy MPW implicitly > > The Legacy MPW (multi-packet write) should not b

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: do not select legacy MPW implicitly

2020-06-12 Thread Slava Ovsiienko
> -Original Message- > From: Alexander Kozyrev > Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 20:42 > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org; Raslan Darawsheh ; Slava > Ovsiienko > Subject: [PATCH] net/mlx5: do not select legacy MPW implicitly > > The Legacy MPW (multi-packet write) should not be engag

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx5: do not select legacy MPW implicitly

2020-06-11 Thread Alexander Kozyrev
The Legacy MPW (multi-packet write) should not be engaged implicitly. We should exclude this function form a Tx burst routine selection process unless it is requested specifically by setting the txq_mpw_en devarg. Exclude this function from the selection process the same way it is done for the Enha