Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx4: use PCI address as port name

2018-02-16 Thread Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 04:29:32PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition > in OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev ^ I believe you mean mlx4 here? > name. This breaks the typical OVS DP

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx4: use PCI address as port name

2018-02-12 Thread Adrien Mazarguil
Hi Yuanhan, On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 04:29:32PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition > in OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev > name. This breaks the typical OVS DPDK use case and brings more puzzle > to the end

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/mlx4: use PCI address as port name

2018-02-11 Thread Yuanhan Liu
It is suggested to use PCI BDF to identify a port for port addition in OVS-DPDK. While mlx5 has its own naming style: name it by ib dev name. This breaks the typical OVS DPDK use case and brings more puzzle to the end users. To fix it, this patch changes it to use PCI BDF as the name, too. Judging