, Wei
>> Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev@dpdk.org; Lu,
>> Wenzhuo ; Ananyev, Konstantin
>>
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: support detection of hot
>> swapped SFP/SFP+
>>
>> On 5/19/2017 11:04 AM, Srinivasan J wrote:
>>> Hi Wei,
>&
> Cc: Thomas Monjalon ; dev@dpdk.org; Lu,
> Wenzhuo ; Ananyev, Konstantin
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: support detection of hot
> swapped SFP/SFP+
>
> On 5/19/2017 11:04 AM, Srinivasan J wrote:
> > Hi Wei,
> > Yes the changes are in ixgbe
27;t call
>> hw->phy.ops.init(hw) anywhere.
>>
>> Thanks & Best Regards
>> -Wei
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
>>> Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2017 6:36 AM
>>>
Thanks & Best Regards
> -Wei
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
>> Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2017 6:36 AM
>> To: Srinivasan J
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo ; Ananyev,
>> Konstantin
&
Of Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Sunday, May 7, 2017 6:36 AM
> To: Srinivasan J
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Lu, Wenzhuo ; Ananyev,
> Konstantin
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: support detection of hot swapped
> SFP/SFP+
>
> 06/05/2017 15:51, Srinivasan J:
> >
06/05/2017 15:51, Srinivasan J:
> Hi,
>Do we need an explicit "Acked-by" keyword for this
> patch to be accepted and applied?
Yes, given it is not a trivial patch, an ack from the maintainer is required.
Anyway, it has been submitted too late for 17.05 testing.
Hi,
Do we need an explicit "Acked-by" keyword for this
patch to be accepted and applied?
Thanks,
Srini
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:53 AM, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote:
> Hi Srini,
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Srinivasan J [mailto:srinid...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, April 24
Hi Srini,
> -Original Message-
> From: Srinivasan J [mailto:srinid...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 6:51 PM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: support detection of hot swapped SFP/SFP+
>
> Hi Wenzhuo,
>
Hi Wenzhuo,
Port hot-plug would require the DPDK app to
dynamically mange ports and the kernel to support PCI hot-plugging.
When multiple ports are detached/attached (SFP's plugged in/out),
would the DPDK port id's remain same? If not, app needs to handle port
id change for a gi
Hi Srini,
> -Original Message-
> From: Srinivasan J [mailto:srinid...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2017 2:24 PM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: support detection of hot swapped SFP/SFP+
>
> Hi Wenzhuo,
>
Hi Wenzhuo,
I understand your concern. I had to do this change
to support hot swap of SFP/SFP+ modules without restarting the DPDK
app. If we have some other mechanism in pipeline to support hot swap
of SFP/SFP+ modules, then my changes can be ignored. I just wanted to
share the
Hi Srini,
> -Original Message-
> From: Srini J [mailto:srinid...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 6:48 PM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo; Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Srinivasan Jayarajan
> Subject: [PATCH] net/ixgbe: support detection of hot swapped SFP/SFP+
>
> From: Srinivasan
From: Srinivasan Jayarajan
Adds support to use a different SFP/SFP+ without restarting the
DPDK app. rte_eth_dev_stop()/rte_eth_dev_start() will need
to be called on the port to detect the SFP/SFP+ change.
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Jayarajan
---
drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_ethdev.c | 1
13 matches
Mail list logo
