Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice/base: workaround for unexpected rule deletion

2020-04-28 Thread Ye Xiaolong
>> Cc: Ye, Xiaolong ; Xing, Beilei >> ; >> Zhang, Xiao ; dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z >> >> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice/base: workaround for unexpected rule >> deletion >> >> Ideally a rule with "TO VSI LIST" action should not be deleted wh

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice/base: workaround for unexpected rule deletion

2020-04-23 Thread Zhao1, Wei
v@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice/base: workaround for unexpected rule > deletion > > Ideally a rule with "TO VSI LIST" action should not be deleted when one of the > VF reset happens. The correct action by kernel PF driver is to remove

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice/base: workaround for unexpected rule deletion

2020-04-22 Thread Qi Zhang
Ideally a rule with "TO VSI LIST" action should not be deleted when one of the VF reset happens. The correct action by kernel PF driver is to remove the VSI of a reset VF from the VSI list, but this is not implemented in kernel PF yet, so workaround is the DCF to prevent a rule with "To VSI List" a