Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Linzhe Lee
> Sent: Saturday, September 3, 2016 3:05 AM
> To: Stephen Hemminger
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: fix atomic refcnt update synchronizatio
yes,stephen.
my config file here: http://pastebin.com/N0RKGArh
2016-09-03 0:51 GMT+08:00 Stephen Hemminger :
> On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 00:31:50 +0800
> Linzhe Lee wrote:
>
>> Thanks for reply, Stephen.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm in x86-64, my cpu is `Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz`.
>>
>>
>>
>> When
Thanks for reply, Stephen.
I'm in x86-64, my cpu is `Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz`.
When allocation mbuf in program1, and transfer it to program2 for free
via ring, the program1 might meet assert in allocate mbuf sometimes.
(`RTE_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 0);`)
but whe
From: ???
chagne atomic ref update to always call atomic_add
when mbuf is allocated by cpu1 and freed by cpu2. cpu1 cache may not be updated
by such a set operation.
causes refcnt reads incorrect values.
---
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 16 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016 00:31:50 +0800
Linzhe Lee wrote:
> Thanks for reply, Stephen.
>
>
>
> I'm in x86-64, my cpu is `Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz`.
>
>
>
> When allocation mbuf in program1, and transfer it to program2 for free
> via ring, the program1 might meet assert in allocat
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:25:06 +0800
lilinzhe wrote:
> From: ???
>
> chagne atomic ref update to always call atomic_add
>
> when mbuf is allocated by cpu1 and freed by cpu2. cpu1 cache may not be
> updated by such a set operation.
> causes refcnt reads incorrect values.
What architecture are y
6 matches
Mail list logo
