> > > 2014-07-23 12:15, Hemant Agrawal:
> > > > The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for
> > > > buffers.
> > > > Irrespective of success or failure, it allocates the mbuf and try to
> > > > put them into the alloc_q
> > > > if the buffers are not added to alloc_q, it fre
2014-11-26 22:20, Thomas Monjalon:
> Ping
>
> 2014-11-11 23:58, Thomas Monjalon:
> > Is there anyone interested in KNI to review this patch please?
> >
> >
> > 2014-07-23 12:15, Hemant Agrawal:
> > > The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for buffers.
> > > Irrespective of
Ping
2014-11-11 23:58, Thomas Monjalon:
> Is there anyone interested in KNI to review this patch please?
>
>
> 2014-07-23 12:15, Hemant Agrawal:
> > The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for buffers.
> > Irrespective of success or failure, it allocates the mbuf and try to
Is there anyone interested in KNI to review this patch please?
2014-07-23 12:15, Hemant Agrawal:
> The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for buffers.
> Irrespective of success or failure, it allocates the mbuf and try to put them
> into the alloc_q
> if the buffers are no
The current implementation of rte_kni_rx_burst polls the fifo for buffers.
Irrespective of success or failure, it allocates the mbuf and try to put them
into the alloc_q
if the buffers are not added to alloc_q, it frees them.
This waste lots of cpu cycles in allocating and freeing the buffers if a
5 matches
Mail list logo
