[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: workaround for XL710 performance

2014-12-28 Thread Zhang, Helin
> > > To: Zhang, Helin > > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: workaround for XL710 > > > performance > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 03:14:08PM +0800, Helin Zhang wrote: > > > > on XL710, pe

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: workaround for XL710 performance

2014-12-26 Thread Neil Horman
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 12:20:11AM +, Zhang, Helin wrote: > Hi Neil > > > -Original Message- > > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 10:55 PM > > To: Zhang, Helin > > Cc: dev at dpdk.org >

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: workaround for XL710 performance

2014-12-25 Thread Zhang, Helin
Hi Neil > -Original Message- > From: Neil Horman [mailto:nhorman at tuxdriver.com] > Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 10:55 PM > To: Zhang, Helin > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: workaround for XL710 performance > > On Wed, Dec 24,

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: workaround for XL710 performance

2014-12-24 Thread Helin Zhang
on XL710, performance number is far from the expectation on recent firmware versions, if promiscuous mode is disabled, or promiscuous mode is enabled and port MAC address is equal to the packet destination MAC address. The fix for this issue may not be integrated in the following firmware version.

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: workaround for XL710 performance

2014-12-24 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 03:14:08PM +0800, Helin Zhang wrote: > on XL710, performance number is far from the expectation on recent > firmware versions, if promiscuous mode is disabled, or promiscuous > mode is enabled and port MAC address is equal to the packet > destination MAC address. The fix for