09/11/2021 07:42, Gregory Etelson:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> >
> > 28/10/2021 17:35, Burakov, Anatoly:
> > > On 28-Oct-21 4:14 PM, Gregory Etelson wrote:
> > > >>> - uint8_t client = 0;
> > > >>> + static uint8_t client = 0;
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov
> >
> >
> > checkpatch has a m
28/10/2021 17:35, Burakov, Anatoly:
> On 28-Oct-21 4:14 PM, Gregory Etelson wrote:
> >>> - uint8_t client = 0;
> >>> + static uint8_t client = 0;
>
> Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov
checkpatch has a message for you:
ERROR:INITIALISED_STATIC: do not initialise statics to 0
On 28-Oct-21 4:14 PM, Gregory Etelson wrote:
Hello Anatoly,
..snip..
b/examples/multi_process/client_server_mp/m
p_server/main.c
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@
process_packets(uint32_t port_num
__rte_unused,
struct rte_mbuf *pkts[], uint16_t
rx_count)
{
uint16_t i;
- uin
On 26-Oct-21 10:50 AM, Gregory Etelson wrote:
MP servers distributes RX packets between clients according to
round-robin scheme.
Current implementation always started packets distribution from
the first client. That procedure resulted in uniform distribution
in cases when RX packets number was a
MP servers distributes RX packets between clients according to
round-robin scheme.
Current implementation always started packets distribution from
the first client. That procedure resulted in uniform distribution
in cases when RX packets number was a multiple of clients number.
However, if RX burs
5 matches
Mail list logo
