Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add field for device data per process

2018-10-05 Thread Thomas Monjalon
05/10/2018 15:26, Ferruh Yigit: > On 10/5/2018 2:17 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 2:01 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > >> Will there be new version? > >> > >> Are we agree on name? > >> > >> Is LIBABIVER increase should be done in this patch, or will there be other > >> patch > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add field for device data per process

2018-10-05 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/5/2018 2:17 PM, Alejandro Lucero wrote: > On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 2:01 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > >> On 10/3/2018 9:44 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> + Cc more people >>> >>> 27/09/2018 13:26, Alejandro Lucero: Primary and secondary processes share a per-device private data. With cur

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add field for device data per process

2018-10-05 Thread Alejandro Lucero
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 2:01 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/3/2018 9:44 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > + Cc more people > > > > 27/09/2018 13:26, Alejandro Lucero: > >> Primary and secondary processes share a per-device private data. With > >> current design it is not possible to have data per-dev

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add field for device data per process

2018-10-05 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/3/2018 9:44 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > + Cc more people > > 27/09/2018 13:26, Alejandro Lucero: >> Primary and secondary processes share a per-device private data. With >> current design it is not possible to have data per-device per-process. >> This is required for handling properly the C

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add field for device data per process

2018-10-04 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/3/2018 9:44 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > + Cc more people > > 27/09/2018 13:26, Alejandro Lucero: >> Primary and secondary processes share a per-device private data. With >> current design it is not possible to have data per-device per-process. >> This is required for handling properly the C

Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add field for device data per process

2018-10-03 Thread Thomas Monjalon
+ Cc more people 27/09/2018 13:26, Alejandro Lucero: > Primary and secondary processes share a per-device private data. With > current design it is not possible to have data per-device per-process. > This is required for handling properly the CPP interface inside the NFP > PMD with multiprocess su

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: add field for device data per process

2018-09-27 Thread Alejandro Lucero
Primary and secondary processes share a per-device private data. With current design it is not possible to have data per-device per-process. This is required for handling properly the CPP interface inside the NFP PMD with multiprocess support. There is also at least another PMD driver, tap, with s