On 9/14/21 12:10 AM, David Marchand wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:54 PM Pablo de Lara
wrote:
rte_efd_create() function was using uint8_t for a socket bitmask,
for one of its parameters.
This limits the maximum of NUMA sockets to be 8.
Changing to to uint64_t increases it to 64, which sho
On 14/09/2021 08:10, David Marchand wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:54 PM Pablo de Lara
> wrote:
>>
>> rte_efd_create() function was using uint8_t for a socket bitmask,
>> for one of its parameters.
>> This limits the maximum of NUMA sockets to be 8.
>> Changing to to uint64_t increases it t
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:54 PM Pablo de Lara
wrote:
>
> rte_efd_create() function was using uint8_t for a socket bitmask,
> for one of its parameters.
> This limits the maximum of NUMA sockets to be 8.
> Changing to to uint64_t increases it to 64, which should be
> more future-proof.
Cc: ppc mai
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Pablo de Lara
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 5:54 PM
> To: Wang, Yipeng1 ; Marohn, Byron
>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] efd: change data type of parameter
>
> rt
rte_efd_create() function was using uint8_t for a socket bitmask,
for one of its parameters.
This limits the maximum of NUMA sockets to be 8.
Changing to to uint64_t increases it to 64, which should be
more future-proof.
Coverity issue: 366390
Fixes: 56b6ef874f8 ("efd: new Elastic Flow Distributor
5 matches
Mail list logo