> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix floating device argument pointer
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 04:43:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 24/10/2018 00:39, Gaëtan Rivet:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018
> -Original Message-
> From: Gaëtan Rivet [mailto:gaetan.ri...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 10:34 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Qi Z
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: fix floating device argument pointer
>
> On We
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 04:43:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 24/10/2018 00:39, Gaëtan Rivet:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:25:22AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 22/10/2018 07:49, Qi Zhang:
> > > > After we insert a devargs into devargs_list, following bus->scan may
> > > >
24/10/2018 00:39, Gaëtan Rivet:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:25:22AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 22/10/2018 07:49, Qi Zhang:
> > > After we insert a devargs into devargs_list, following bus->scan may
> > > destroy it due to another rte_devargs_insert. Its better not to use
> > > a de
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 09:25:22AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 22/10/2018 07:49, Qi Zhang:
> > After we insert a devargs into devargs_list, following bus->scan may
> > destroy it due to another rte_devargs_insert. Its better not to use
> > a devargs pointer after it has been inserted.
>
22/10/2018 07:49, Qi Zhang:
> After we insert a devargs into devargs_list, following bus->scan may
> destroy it due to another rte_devargs_insert. Its better not to use
> a devargs pointer after it has been inserted.
I think the problem is in:
rte_devargs_insert(struct rte_devargs *da)
{
int
After we insert a devargs into devargs_list, following bus->scan may
destroy it due to another rte_devargs_insert. Its better not to use
a devargs pointer after it has been inserted.
Fixes: 911462eb4a5f ("eal: simplify parameters of hotplug functions")
Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang
---
lib/librte_eal
7 matches
Mail list logo