03/10/2018 16:11, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 9/25/2018 10:04 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 25/09/2018 10:03, Ferruh Yigit:
> >> On 9/24/2018 5:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> > @@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ ixgbe_recv_pk
On 9/25/2018 10:04 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 25/09/2018 10:03, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 9/24/2018 5:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> @@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf
25/09/2018 10:03, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 9/24/2018 5:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> >>> @@ -2025,7 +2025,7 @@ ixgbe_recv_pkts_lro(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf
> >>> **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts,
> >>> st
On 9/24/2018 5:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 24/09/2018 17:06, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 9/20/2018 1:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> -#define false FALSE
>>> -#define true TRUE
>>
>> TRUE and FALSE also defined in this patch, can we remove them too?
>
24/09/2018 17:06, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 9/20/2018 1:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > -#define false FALSE
> > -#define true TRUE
>
> TRUE and FALSE also defined in this patch, can we remove them too?
I don't see the need to remove TRUE and FALSE.
The
On 9/20/2018 1:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> When trying to include stdbool.h in DPDK base headers, there are a lot
> of conflicts with drivers which redefine bool/true/false
> in their compatibility layer.
>
> It is fixed by including stdbool.h in these drivers.
> Some errors with usage of bool
On 9/21/2018 3:49 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 21/09/2018 15:47, Ferruh Yigit:
>> On 9/20/2018 1:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> When trying to include stdbool.h in DPDK base headers, there are a lot
>>> of conflicts with drivers which redefine bool/true/false
>>> in their compatibility layer.
>>
21/09/2018 15:47, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 9/20/2018 1:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > When trying to include stdbool.h in DPDK base headers, there are a lot
> > of conflicts with drivers which redefine bool/true/false
> > in their compatibility layer.
> >
> > It is fixed by including stdbool.h in the
On 9/20/2018 1:18 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> When trying to include stdbool.h in DPDK base headers, there are a lot
> of conflicts with drivers which redefine bool/true/false
> in their compatibility layer.
>
> It is fixed by including stdbool.h in these drivers.
> Some errors with usage of bool
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 5:49 AM
> To: Ferruh Yigit ; Rahul Lakkireddy
> ; Wenzhuo Lu ; Qi
> Zhang ; Xiao Wang ;
> Konstantin Ananyev ; Mody, Rasesh
> ; Patil, Harish ; Shaikh,
> Shahed ; Yong Wang
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PAT
When trying to include stdbool.h in DPDK base headers, there are a lot
of conflicts with drivers which redefine bool/true/false
in their compatibility layer.
It is fixed by including stdbool.h in these drivers.
Some errors with usage of bool type are also fixed in some drivers.
Note: the driver q
11 matches
Mail list logo
