Hi, Thomas Monjalon
The patch V2 has been sent by luyicai, and V2 is good to me.
Thanks, Xavier
On 2020/7/11 5:07, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
Still no review.
Please give your real name in the Signed-off so it can be merged.
24/06/2020 12:43, Thomas Monjalon:
Any review please?
19/05/202
Still no review.
Please give your real name in the Signed-off so it can be merged.
24/06/2020 12:43, Thomas Monjalon:
> Any review please?
>
> 19/05/2020 13:18, luyicai:
> > When two host is connected directly without any devices like switch,
> > and also enable dedicated tx/rx queues on bonding
Any review please?
19/05/2020 13:18, luyicai:
> When two host is connected directly without any devices like switch,
> and also enable dedicated tx/rx queues on bonding devices slaves,
> rx_machine_update would recieving partner lacp negotiation packets,
> which partner's port mac filled with zero
When two host is connected directly without any devices like switch,
and also enable dedicated tx/rx queues on bonding devices slaves,
rx_machine_update would recieving partner lacp negotiation packets,
which partner's port mac filled with zeros. So in this situation,
it would never go rx_machine b
When two host is connected directly without any devices like switch,
and also enable dedicated tx/rx queues on bonding devices slaves,
rx_machine_update would recieving partner lacp negotiation packets,
which partner's port mac filled with zeros. So in this situation,
it would never go rx_machine b
5 matches
Mail list logo
