Hey folks,
> On 28 Jul 2016, at 17:47, De Lara Guarch, Pablo intel.com> wrote:
> Fair enough. So you mean to use rte_eth_dev_attach in ethdev library and
> a similar function in cryptodev library?
There is a rte_eth_dev_get_port_by_name() which gets the port id right after
the rte_eal_vdev_init
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:47 PM, De Lara Guarch, Pablo
wrote:
>> This is a layer violation.
>> EAL does not know a thing about "ports".
>>
>> This information should come from the crypto framework and so an api
>> in crypto framework is the right place, not EAL.
>>
>> This is a NACK for me.
>
> Fa
> -Original Message-
> From: David Marchand [mailto:david.marchand at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 5:18 AM
> To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Mcnamara, John
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce API change for virtual devic
Hello Pablo,
On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Pablo de Lara
wrote:
> In order to create a virtual device, user needs to call
> rte_eal_vdev_init generally, but this function returns 0
> on success or negative number if error. Instead, something
> more useful would be to return the port or device i
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of De Lara Guarch,
> Pablo
> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 3:55 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon; Yigit, Ferruh
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Mcnamara, John
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce A
2016-07-05 14:04, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 7/4/2016 3:50 PM, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> > +* The rte_eal_vdev_init function will be changed in 16.11 to return
> > + the port/device id of the device created, instead of 0, when it has been
> > + initialized successfully, so user can use the returned value st
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2016 2:39 PM
> To: Yigit, Ferruh
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; De Lara Guarch, Pablo; Mcnamara, John
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce API change
On 7/4/2016 3:50 PM, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> In order to create a virtual device, user needs to call
> rte_eal_vdev_init generally, but this function returns 0
> on success or negative number if error. Instead, something
> more useful would be to return the port or device id of the
> device created,
On 04/07/16 15:50, Pablo de Lara wrote:
> In order to create a virtual device, user needs to call
> rte_eal_vdev_init generally, but this function returns 0
> on success or negative number if error. Instead, something
> more useful would be to return the port or device id of the
> device created, s
In order to create a virtual device, user needs to call
rte_eal_vdev_init generally, but this function returns 0
on success or negative number if error. Instead, something
more useful would be to return the port or device id of the
device created, so the user can call rte_eal_vdev_init
function and
10 matches
Mail list logo