On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:49:57 +0100
Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-03-18 13:00, Jan Viktorin:
> > The RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON was only a result of the gcc testing.
> > However, the target CPU may not support NEON or the user can disable to
> > use it (as it does not always improve the performance)
2016-03-18 13:00, Jan Viktorin:
> The RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON was only a result of the gcc testing.
> However, the target CPU may not support NEON or the user can disable to
> use it (as it does not always improve the performance).
>
> The RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON detection is now based on both,
The RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON was only a result of the gcc testing.
However, the target CPU may not support NEON or the user can disable to
use it (as it does not always improve the performance).
The RTE_MACHINE_CPUFLAG_NEON detection is now based on both, the
__ARM_NEON_FP feature from gcc and CON
3 matches
Mail list logo