On 10/9/2017 5:16 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 8/22/2017 6:03 AM, Li Han wrote:
>> in parse_ringnuma_config/parse_portnuma_config functions,port_id
>> should less than RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS,but port_id_is_invalid check
>> assumes that port_id may be 255.>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Han
> Reviewed-by: Ferru
On 8/22/2017 6:03 AM, Li Han wrote:
> in parse_ringnuma_config/parse_portnuma_config functions,port_id
> should less than RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS,but port_id_is_invalid check
> assumes that port_id may be 255.
testpmd using RTE_PORT_ALL [1], which is in valid port_id range, as
special meaning [2] making
> -Original Message-
> From: Rybalchenko, Kirill
> Sent: Monday, September 4, 2017 10:12 PM
> To: Li Han ; Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd:fix invalid port id parameters
>
> Hi Han,
>
> > -Or
Hi Han,
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Li Han
> Sent: Tuesday 22 August 2017 06:04
> To: Wu, Jingjing
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Li Han
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd:fix invalid port id parameters
>
>
in parse_ringnuma_config/parse_portnuma_config functions,port_id
should less than RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS,but port_id_is_invalid check
assumes that port_id may be 255.
Signed-off-by: Li Han
---
app/test-pmd/parameters.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test-
in parse_ringnuma_config/parse_portnuma_config functions,port_id
should less than RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS,but port_id_is_invalid check
assumes that port_id may be 255.
Signed-off-by: Li Han
---
app/test-pmd/parameters.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mode change 100644 =>
in parse_ringnuma_config/parse_portnuma_config functions,port_id
should less than RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS,but port_id_is_invalid check
assumes that port_id may be 255.
Signed-off-by: Li Han
---
app/test-pmd/parameters.c | 6 --
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mode change 100644 =>
7 matches
Mail list logo