Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: Ipsec-secgw packet processing

2020-09-01 Thread Iremonger, Bernard
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; us...@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: Ipsec-secgw packet processing > > HI Satya - > > Do you mean packets are not at all seen at the output OR packets are seen > but data is not encrypted with just ESP headers added? > This is what

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: Ipsec-secgw packet processing

2020-08-31 Thread Pathak, Pravin
HI Satya - Do you mean packets are not at all seen at the output OR packets are seen but data is not encrypted with just ESP headers added? This is what I see with Cypto NULL device and I think is expected behavior of NULL device. Pravin -Original Message- From: users On Behalf Of An

Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: Ipsec-secgw packet processing

2020-08-30 Thread Anoob Joseph
Hi Satya, What you are attempting is lookaside crypto offload. So in that case the mbuf->ol_flags fields won’t be used. Also, I’m not sure what all algos are available in ‘crypto_null’. In lookaside crypto offload model, packets are received in ipsec-secgw and lookup happens in ipsec-secgw. The