Hi Radu, Akhil,
Please see inline
Thanks,
Anoob
>
> On 9/6/2021 12:36 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote:
> > Hi Radu,
> >
> >> Hi Akhil, I suppose they can be complementary, with this one being a
> >> hard ESN limit that the user can enforce by setting the initial ESN
> >> value - but there is no requirem
On 9/6/2021 12:36 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote:
Hi Radu,
Hi Akhil, I suppose they can be complementary, with this one being a hard
ESN limit that the user can enforce by setting the initial ESN value - but there
is no requirement to do so. Also, this change doesn't need explicit support
added in th
Hi Radu,
> Hi Akhil, I suppose they can be complementary, with this one being a hard
> ESN limit that the user can enforce by setting the initial ESN value - but
> there
> is no requirement to do so. Also, this change doesn't need explicit support
> added in the PMDs.
What is the actual use case
On 9/5/2021 3:47 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote:
Hi Radu,
--
Update ipsec_xform definition to include ESN field.
Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty
Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau
Signed-off-by: Abhijit Sinha
Signed-off-by: Daniel Martin B
Hi Radu,
> --
> Update ipsec_xform definition to include ESN field.
>
> Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty
> Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau
> Signed-off-by: Abhijit Sinha
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Martin Buckley
> ---
> lib/security/r
5 matches
Mail list logo
