; konstantin.anan...@intel.com;
vladimir.medved...@intel.com; bruce.richard...@intel.com;
roy.fan.zh...@intel.com; Anoob Joseph ;
abhijit.si...@intel.com; daniel.m.buck...@intel.com; Archana Muniganti
; Tejasree Kondoj ;
ma...@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] [PATCH v4 02/10] security: add UDP params
On 9/24/2021 10:11 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
On 9/6/2021 4:39 PM, Nicolau, Radu wrote:
On 9/5/2021 3:19 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote:
Hi Radu,
Add support for specifying UDP port params for UDP encapsulation
option.
Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty
Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau
Signed-off-by: Ab
On 9/6/2021 4:39 PM, Nicolau, Radu wrote:
On 9/5/2021 3:19 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote:
Hi Radu,
Add support for specifying UDP port params for UDP encapsulation
option.
Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty
Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau
Signed-off-by: Abhijit Sinha
Signed-off-by: Daniel Martin Buckle
On 9/5/2021 3:19 PM, Akhil Goyal wrote:
Hi Radu,
Add support for specifying UDP port params for UDP encapsulation option.
Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty
Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau
Signed-off-by: Abhijit Sinha
Signed-off-by: Daniel Martin Buckley
Do we really need to specify the port num
Hi Radu,
> Add support for specifying UDP port params for UDP encapsulation option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Declan Doherty
> Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau
> Signed-off-by: Abhijit Sinha
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Martin Buckley
Do we really need to specify the port numbers for NAT-T?
I suppose they ar
5 matches
Mail list logo
